Photo Preview

[schiffeg68]

Awww...too cute!!

PGP Classic Soaps (http://pgpclassicsoaps.blogspot.com/2008/11/atwt-photo-preview-its-girl-paul-sees.html)

And Paul invisions his baby girl with dark, naturally curly hair, just like his wife.

[therealpaul]

OMGoodness. The Paul and Dusty is FABULOUS!

[schiffeg68]

I do have to wonder how Paul thinks he's going to overpower Dusty (and a gun) with an axe. By the time he swings it, the gun will have surely gone off. It's not like Dusty is gun-shy.

[Scarlett_Echo]

What am I missing? Why is there an axe in the room?

[Scarlett_Echo]

Oops! I missed the Christmas tree in the pic. :rofl:

Still... wouldn't the axe be left outside before dragging in the tree?

[CarJackfan]

Doesn't everyone keep an axe by their fireplace :rofl: He probably forgot the wood and brought in the axe instead. ;)

[hbgrrrrl]

Whoever commented on the blog that gun beats axe everytime is right

Shoot him Dusty. Preferably somewhere that won't cause a lot of damage, but when he goes down he can hit his head and permanently lose all memories of the past three years.

[kathylul]

EEEEEEEEEEE!!! Paul the Santa Clause...Awwwww!! What a gorgeous family!!:Wub::Wub::Wub:
:Faint::Faint::Faint:



I'm glad Dusty gets arrested. He can rot in jail for all I care. Self defense, Dusty? Really??? That's not what it looks like to me; there is a clear distance between he and Paul. Dusty wanted to kill Paul. :rant:

[schiffeg68]

Paul must be dreaming of her first Christmas, which would come next Christmas.

[kathylul]

Doesn't everyone keep an axe by their fireplace :rofl: He probably forgot the wood and brought in the axe instead. ;)

the axe is there because of the Christmas tree (behind him in the pic); he had just cut it down and brought it in.

[kathylul]

Paul must be dreaming of her first Christmas, which would come next Christmas.

Yep, it looks that way. :Wub:

[CarJackfan]

the axe is there because of the Christmas tree (behind him in the pic); he had just cut it down and brought it in.

Who brings the axe in the house? :rofl:

[ChristiK]

LMAO. You all are too funny!
Who brings the axe in the house? :rofl:
Maybe Paul had a vision and knew he may need it. :D

[therealpaul]

I keep mine right here next to my computer. Some days it's all I can do to keep myself from using it. I'm really looking forward to Paul and Dusty. Kind of like rock, scissors, paper. It'd be awesome if Craig appeared with a detonater in his hand. WOOT!

[kathylul]

Who brings the axe in the house? :rofl:

I guess he does, lol.

[Starlight3]

That little girl looks sweet but I've got a question whatever happened to the other little girl he had the vision of when he was in that car accident awhile back? She was a little older and very pretty! Who she was - was never answered. I hope TPTB haven't forgotten about her!

[Bluribbon]

Maybe Paul had a vision and knew he may need it. :D

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

Seriously, an axe in the living room. What are these writers smoking?

[Betty27_1]

EEEEEEEEEEE!!! Paul the Santa Clause...Awwwww!! What a gorgeous family!!:Wub::Wub::Wub:
:Faint::Faint::Faint:



I'm glad Dusty gets arrested. He can rot in jail for all I care. Self defense, Dusty? Really??? That's not what it looks like to me; there is a clear distance between he and Paul. Dusty wanted to kill Paul. :rant:

Actually, you can't even tell from that picture who's to blame. Paul's holding the axe up and pointing it at Dusty.

[kathylul]

Actually, you can't even tell from that picture who's to blame. Paul's holding the axe up and pointing it at Dusty.

Well, Paul can't shoot Dusty with an axe, lol, and Dusty has enough distance between he and Paul that from that range, the shooting was no accident, IMO.

[Betty27_1]

Well, Paul can't shoot Dusty with an axe, lol, and Dusty has enough distance between he and Paul that from that range, the shooting was no accident, IMO.

The point I'm making is, Paul could come at Dusty with that axe or Paul could of threatened Dusty. Just because Dusty has the gun and not Paul does not mean Dusty is not defending himself. An axe can be just as deadly as a gun can be.

Paul IS NOT unarmed in that picture, so how do you know that Dusty is not defending himself? Paul doesn't look helpless in that picture to me, in fact he looks downright threatening with the look on his face.

[schiffeg68]

If Paul starts swinging that axe, Dusty has every right to protect himself. Paul's the one that pulled out that gun in the first place. Just another sign that he's losing it and needs help.

[kathylul]

The point I'm making is, Paul could come at Dusty with that axe or Paul could of threatened Dusty. Just because Dusty has the gun and not Paul does not mean Dusty is not defending himself. An axe can be just as deadly as a gun can be.

Paul IS NOT unarmed in that picture, so how do you know that Dusty is not defending himself? Paul doesn't look helpless in that picture to me, in fact he looks downright threatening with the look on his face.

True; but you would think that if Dusty was able to take the gun away, he'd also be able to take the axe away, and have you ever held an axe? It's heavy toting, lol. For Paul to want to strike and to succeed are two different things. I see what you're saying though, and I know Paul's not innocent. I'm just saying I think shooting Paul IMO could've been avoided; I guess we just have to see how it plays out. :angel:

ETA: Dusty did invade private property too; let's not forget that either. He barged into Paul's home to threaten him. Again, what Paul did was not right and he needs help, but Fairwinds is Paul's house and he has every right to protect it from intruders, IMO.

[scrawny]

That little girl looks sweet but I've got a question whatever happened to the other little girl he had the vision of when he was in that car accident awhile back? She was a little older and very pretty! Who she was - was never answered. I hope TPTB haven't forgotten about her!

I took that little girl to be little girl Jennifer.....Emiloony's and Paul's first daughter, named Jennifer ;) The one that's dead.

The point I'm making is, Paul could come at Dusty with that axe or Paul could of threatened Dusty. Just because Dusty has the gun and not Paul does not mean Dusty is not defending himself. An axe can be just as deadly as a gun can be.

Paul IS NOT unarmed in that picture, so how do you know that Dusty is not defending himself? Paul doesn't look helpless in that picture to me, in fact he looks downright threatening with the look on his face.

And a whole lot messier. LOL...seems to me, I read somewhere it's diaperboy's gun. That he pulls on Dusty. Dusty takes it from him.....to defend himself from the wacked out with jealousy and insecurity (brought on by the slag flirting with and asking her ex lover to put his hands on her) mommy's boy.

[Betty27_1]

True; but you would think that if Dusty was able to take the gun away, he'd also be able to take the axe away, and have you ever held an axe? It's heavy toting, lol. For Paul to want to strike and to succeed are two different things. I see what you're saying though, and I know Paul's not innocent. I'm just saying I think shooting Paul IMO could've been avoided; I guess we just have to see how it plays out. :angel:

ETA: Dusty did invade private property too; let's not forget that either. He barged into Paul's home to threaten him. Again, what Paul did was not right and he needs help, but Fairwinds is Paul's house and he has every right to protect it from intruders, IMO.

Fairwinds is Ro's house, not Paul's.

[Bluribbon]

Seriously, how many pregnant woman go around asking men other than the father to put their hands on their stomach.....ESPECIALLY when you have a crazed, jealous husband/father that you supposed want to see get well.....This girl is beyond disgusting and does not GAS about her husband.

[ChristiK]

ETA: Dusty did invade private property too; let's not forget that either. He barged into Paul's home to threaten him. Again, what Paul did was not right and he needs help, but Fairwinds is Paul's house and he has every right to protect it from intruders, IMO.
As far as we know, no one is ever "let in" at Fairwinds. People just come and go. After Paul's latest stunt, I think Dusty has ever right to confront him about what he did, whether it be at Fairwinds or somewhere else.

Also, as Betty said, Fairwinds belongs to Ro, not Paul. As far as I'm concerned, Paul shouldn't be there in the first place.

[Betty27_1]

As far as we know, no one is ever "let in" at Fairwinds. People just come and go. After Paul's latest stunt, I think Dusty has ever right to confront him about what he did, whether it be at Fairwinds or somewhere else.

Also, as Betty said, Fairwinds belongs to Ro, not Paul. As far as I'm concerned, Paul shouldn't be there in the first place.

So, as it stands, Paul and the Meggit are intruding as well, and breaking the law.

Nope, Paul shouldn't be there. He's got himself a nice penthouse. But I guess that's not good enough for who he's married to.

[ChristiK]

So, as it stands, Paul and the Meggit are intruding as well, and breaking the law.

Nope, Paul shouldn't be there. He's got himself a nice penthouse. But I guess that's not good enough for who he's married to.
I definitely don't think Paul should be there. He started using Ro the second she came out of her coma, IMO, and he still hasn't stopped. As a Ro fan, it bugs me more than I can say.

I wish they'd let Carly take an active interest in protecting Ro's assets now. If there was ever a woman who could get his butt out of there, it's her. LOL.

[kathylul]

As far as we know, no one is ever "let in" at Fairwinds. People just come and go. After Paul's latest stunt, I think Dusty has ever right to confront him about what he did, whether it be at Fairwinds or somewhere else.

Also, as Betty said, Fairwinds belongs to Ro, not Paul. As far as I'm concerned, Paul shouldn't be there in the first place.

I'm sorry, according to the writers, this is Paul's house now, maybe he got it in his divorce settlement (which was all played off-screen lol) and possession is 9/10 of the law. whether you want to argue that this is Rosanna's house or not, Paul lives there; a man's home is his castle. If someone came into 'your' house, WITHOUT 'your' permission, legally you have a right to defend yourself and it from an intruder. A man has a right to bear arms in his own home for protection. Paul felt threatened. After Dusty, who was wrongfully there to begin with, took the gun away from Paul and clearly had it in his possession, Paul then had a right to defend himself, especially if he thought Dusty was going to kill him after what he did to him, and guess what? he was right, lol, because that's exactly what Dusty did.

Sorry, Dusty was right to be angry with Paul, and if he had approached him in neutral territory, I'd say may the best man win, but he didn't. He came into Paul's safe-haven, his home, looking for trouble...and trouble he got. And if he really wanted to get Paul back, why not skip Paul altogether and just go tell Meg the truth? that would've been much better revenge, right? But NO, he WANTED to kill Paul. I hope he rots in jail.

[kathylul]

So, as it stands, Paul and the Meggit are intruding as well, and breaking the law.

Nope, Paul shouldn't be there. He's got himself a nice penthouse. But I guess that's not good enough for who he's married to.

You can take that point up with the writers, lol, because according to them, this is Paul's house now. Even when you rent a place, while you live there, you have a right to protect it and yourself from intruders.

[anasjo2]

I'm sorry, according to the writers, this is Paul's house now, maybe he got it in his divorce settlement (which was all played off-screen lol) and possession is 9/10 of the law. whether you want to argue that this is Rosanna's house or not, Paul lives there; a man's home is his castle. If someone came into 'your' house, WITHOUT 'your' permission, legally you have a right to defend yourself and it from an intruder. A man has a right to bear arms in his own home for protection. Paul felt threatened. After Dusty, who was wrongfully there to begin with, took the gun away from Paul and clearly had it in his possession, Paul then had a right to defend himself, especially if he thought Dusty was going to kill him after what he did to him, and guess what? he was right, lol, because that's exactly what Dusty did.

Sorry, Dusty was right to be angry with Paul, and if he had approached him in neutral territory, I'd say may the best man win, but he didn't. He came into Paul's safe-haven, his home, looking for trouble...and trouble he got. And if he really wanted to get Paul back, why not skip Paul altogether and just go tell Meg the truth? that would've been much better revenge, right? But NO, he WANTED to kill Paul. I hope he rots in jail.

Exactly,

[therealpaul]

After seeing Paul go off on Josie today, my expectations for the Dusty confrontation are high. What a great opportunity for some good stuff. I'm hoping Paul wasn't all puffed up, because he was ranting on a woman.

[ChristiK]

I'm sorry, according to the writers, this is Paul's house now, maybe he got it in his divorce settlement (which was all played off-screen lol) and possession is 9/10 of the law. whether you want to argue that this is Rosanna's house or not, Paul lives there; a man's home is his castle. If someone came into 'your' house, WITHOUT 'your' permission, legally you have a right to defend yourself and it from an intruder. A man has a right to bear arms in his own home for protection. Paul felt threatened. After Dusty, who was wrongfully there to begin with, took the gun away from Paul and clearly had it in his possession, Paul then had a right to defend himself, especially if he thought Dusty was going to kill him after what he did to him, and guess what? he was right, lol, because that's exactly what Dusty did.

Sorry, Dusty was right to be angry with Paul, and if he had approached him in neutral territory, I'd say may the best man win, but he didn't. He came into Paul's safe-haven, his home, looking for trouble...and trouble he got. And if he really wanted to get Paul back, why not skip Paul altogether and just go tell Meg the truth? that would've been much better revenge, right? But NO, he WANTED to kill Paul. I hope he rots in jail.
Thanks, Kathy.

May I ask you a question? Have you ever thought Paul or Meg did anything wrong, or not nice, or out of line in any way whatsoever?

[Betty27_1]

You can take that point up with the writers, lol, because according to them, this is Paul's house now. Even when you rent a place, while you live there, you have a right to protect it and yourself from intruders.

Thing is, we never saw the divorce settlement, so just because the writers are saying that...in other words Paul is saying that, does not make it so. So, therefore, he may still be there illegally. You can't just say a house belongs to you and live there unless you have rightful ownership of it.

When you rent a place, you are paying on that property and have permission from the owner to be there. We have no idea if Paul truly does have a right to be there.

[Starlight3]

Didn't Rosanna sign everything over to Paul before she slipped back into a coma? Boy,talk about a dumb move!

[schiffeg68]

^ I'm thinking along those lines. Though nothing was specifically said, Rosanna always knew there was a good chance she would retreat back into her coma. I think she had finances and plans set for if/when that happened. And I'd think ownership of the house would be part of that. I KNOW there was a scene where Rosanna talked about naming Paul in charge of her finances, should that happen.

[truefan]

:) Thanks for posting that. I like the photo of Paul playing Santa to Meg and their daugther. Dusty going to Pauls house is wrong. He should have let the police handle it and get Paul back by being a good friend to Meg. That would hurt Paul more then anything.

[schiffeg68]

^ I'm thinking along those lines. Though nothing was specifically said, Rosanna always knew there was a good chance she would retreat back into her coma. I think she had finances and plans set for if/when that happened. And I'd think ownership of the house would be part of that. I KNOW there was a scene where Rosanna talked about naming Paul in charge of her finances, should that happen.

I just wanted to make a correction on what I said (because I just looked it up) there is a scene where Rosanna and Paul talk about having joint accounts and Paul having medical power of attorney. So I'm still going to assume Rosanna had her 'house' in order, just in case she were to relapse.

[kathylul]

Thanks, Kathy.

May I ask you a question? Have you ever thought Paul or Meg did anything wrong, or not nice, or out of line in any way whatsoever?

You're welcome, and yes, I have. I did say that Dusty had a right to be angry and if he had accosted Paul out somewhere in public (or even in a back alley) then it would be each man for himself and may the best one win. I know what Paul did was wrong and it came out of his unstable state of mind...I'm NOT disputing that. What I'm saying is that Dusty was asking for trouble by coming after Paul in his own house. Everyone has a right to believe that their home is their save-haven, because the law states that it is. It was stupid of Dusty to come there to deal with Paul. If this happened in Old Town or something, Paul probably wouldn't even have had a gun to begin with, and like I said, why not just go to Meg and tell her everything? Dusty Donovan is an idiot, and I still say I hope he rots in jail.

[leilani]

If Paul starts swinging that axe, Dusty has every right to protect himself. Paul's the one that pulled out that gun in the first place. Just another sign that he's losing it and needs help.

I agree.

[kathylul]

Thing is, we never saw the divorce settlement, so just because the writers are saying that...in other words Paul is saying that, does not make it so. So, therefore, he may still be there illegally. You can't just say a house belongs to you and live there unless you have rightful ownership of it.

When you rent a place, you are paying on that property and have permission from the owner to be there. We have no idea if Paul truly does have a right to be there.

which is why you can only go by what the writers say and reveal. As of now, they say it's Paul's.

[kathylul]

That little girl looks sweet but I've got a question whatever happened to the other little girl he had the vision of when he was in that car accident awhile back? She was a little older and very pretty! Who she was - was never answered. I hope TPTB haven't forgotten about her!

The little girl in Paul's dream after his car crash in 06 was of his daughter Jennifer; she even had Jennifer's red hair. The little girl in Paul's dream this year is of his and Meg's daughter, Eliza, and I love that he dreams she has dark, curly hair just like his wife. :Wub::Wub::Wub:

[avasmom]

Ive been rooting and campaigning for Paul and Meg to have their own place to live. I hope it can happen in the new year.

Like Meg's fantasy, Id love everything to be new for Paul and Meg and Eliza. A new start for PEG and their daughter. A new place to start their life together. A whole new set of priorities and perspectives.

If they dont get their dream Christmas this year, I hope they get it next year.

What a gorgeous little family they'll make some day. Eliza in Pauls dream is positively darling.:P:hug: